Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (1280)	8/8/2008 12:26:05 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) of 86355

Which it clearly is, and by a very large amount. It clearly isn't when you add all the economic cost of imported oil. Oil is worth more than the cost "The cost" on not importing oil is a frozen, depression economy where we couldn't move goods or services. So yes at $1000 a barrel "oil is worth more than the cost". We are fighting a resource war. ------------------------------------------------------- Military spending is not an oil subsidy. Currently it is. Not to a sufficient extent, esp. not if you want the electricity to be produced from alternative sources. "Alternatives" are a different discussion. But as I said we need a slight increase in production at the back end. Have you noticed the utilities getting behind electric vehicles?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next