>>>>Putting this much time into analyzing a
>>>>co. you have NO INTERESET in doesn't
>>>>appear very 'bright' to me.
Pugs,
I think after seeing a fuller range of "Sal" posts he and I are a hell of a lot closer to an "understanding", than you and I are that is sure. He and I are both telling you in different ways that you either analyse BEFORE YOU HAVE THAT INTREST that you and others keep insisting that I have. Or you will piss and moan AFTER YOU HAVE THAT interest and have nobody to blame but yourself.
I have been saying Ingrid is crap. Now after buying as it went up this last couple of weeks on the basis of Ingrid and the execs being on their way to "guess where" you are finally waking up to gee I
wonder if Ingrid had me for lunch.
That seems a little "dim" to me. I have said I would like to engage in an intelligent discussion. The fact that you won't doesn't necessarily mean that you are not intelligent. It could mean a lot of things. Like
you are a hard headed kid with a little experience. I have told you I think you are smart. The question that remains to be seen is what will you do with your intelligence.
Five years from now you will have the same amount of intelligence. The question is will you have 5 years of experience, or will you have one year of experience 5 times? Or by using your brain instead of your mouth will you possibly have the equilivant of 7 years of experiance because you would listen to somebody with a lot more experience and learn from them. That the very hardest part is figuring out is Rick (with no email address pulling my chain) or is it Ingrid (who has an email address and tells you she is 10 layers deeper under cover than Rick is), is something I will grant. One way to do this, that seems fairly bright, is to go back and test your model applied to history, before you test it at your peril, by applying it to the future and find out later that your model got you in trouble.
You showed your "brightness" when I offered you the test of the "West" model and suggested that you THINK. and your immediate response was "next".
Your continued philisophy and view of "intellectualism" is one that I can agree with to a very large extent. But you carry it too far and want to apply avoidence to every form of the word that sounds like...you can be, use and apply "intelligence" without being an "intelluctual ass" In avoiding intellectualism, as well as the use of your intelligence you keep getting left with nothing but being an "ass"
So Sal rightly comes in and stirrs up the thread, saying in that case you are a bunch of damn fools that didn't do you homework when you should have, i.e. while you still had NO INTEREST.
Will the "light" ever come on for you? |
