I notice that carranza's response to the post your linked is exactly the same as mine. You're interesting to read as long as you don't insult and demean. Otherwise, I can just pick up the onion.
theonion.com
In any case, the burden of proof is always on the accuser, not the accused, and so your inability to cite his post just means to me that he didn't say that. But I'll ask him and get back to you. And then, matter over, move on to something greener, golder, dealers choice.
The other interesting part of your post...
"BTW, Maurice, about gold and QCOM, you remain wrong"
The tides have turned and in fact, Maurice was right, QCOM is outperforming gold.
finance.yahoo.com
Also, then there's this little company, about to go public, revolutionary, that QCOM has an 8% stake in. Here's where to begin the search...Yet-Ming Chiang. Everything comes back full circle sometimes, maybe everytime. |
