Donner Minerals (DML.V) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Terry J. Crebs who wrote (346)	10/18/1997 4:52:00 PM
From: Feline	of 11676

We have to know the elevation of the collars as well. I was under the impression that the stratigraphic "basin" idea they were exploring dipped to the nw and therefore the step out holes should have intersected thicker intervals with the entry point being at 175m or so and the exit point lower in the stratigraphy. The postulated magma chamber, if it exists, is unlikely to have a consistent (thin) horizon. I believe that they are vertical holes. An angle hole across 75 would do lots of good as there is a chance that this high grade zone is remobilized stuff in a small fault zone. Nobody has described the fabric of the interval in hole 75 and I find that interesting as the DFR stuff was clearly magmatic sulfide. I am also concerned that there are holes between 67 and 75 as the drill grid to date has been on 50m centers. Why would they step out 250m? The gravity anomaly is very subtle as the mgal variation from the barren gabbro to the high of the profile is not significant. More po or a facies change in the olivine could ? explain the anomaly. Anyhow, until they get a decent interval this is geologically interesting but economically it is a non-event. I'm ready to buy NAI on good news.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next