SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Esprit Exploration Ltd.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: no1coalking8/14/2008 11:09:09 AM
   of 2774
 
THE SEC & Their Problem Public Demands They Stop Market Manipulation, NOW !
And an important look at SEC short-selling rules (or lack thereof).
internetnews.com

August 13, 2008
By Paul Shread:

* * *

Finally, with the SEC temporary ban on naked short-selling now expired, we'll offer anecdotal evidence to suggest that the SEC may want to reinstate permanent controls on short-selling: From July 2007, when the 70-year-old uptick rule was rescinded, until mid-July, when the naked short-selling ban was announced, the market had more 90% volume and point days (when the vast majority of volume and points gained or lost move in the direction of the trend) than anytime in nearly 60 years, according to Lowry Research — and those kind of days usually only occur at major market bottoms. The last 90% day was to the downside on June 26. Since the July 15 SEC announcement, there have been no 90% days.
Coincidence? We can't say for sure, but the high number of 90% days that have occurred in the last year suggests that short-selling controls may have contributed more to market stability than the SEC realized.

Paul Shread is a Chartered Market Technician (CMT) and member of the Market Technicians Association.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext