SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (22694)8/17/2008 9:59:19 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
Pearly the stupidity of your posts is not arguing. But the links to information that so demonstrates how stupid your belief in reality is, is very humorously educational.

You don't have to argue with me. I just ask you to keep presenting the idiotic arguments and facts that you seem to believe gives you some claim to having a rational mind that comprehends anything.

Not I understand what two German Physicists are saying about the fabricated framework of science that does in effect define your Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects.

So you believe I and Dr. GERHARD GERLICH and Dr. RALF D. TSCHEUSCHNER "either doesn't understand high school physics, or who deliberately misinterprets high school physics."

I do understand that 40 to 500 times of a stronger green house gas has more than 99% effect over a fraction of 1 part of a much weaker greenhouse gas.

The trace effect of CO2 goes with it's trace existence and properties. Only magic relgious faith or models with demonstrated faulty to the point of totally erroneous predictions proffer more than a trace effect of CO2. Less us call a trace less than some fraction of 1 part in 10,000.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext