SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Brumar898/25/2008 5:09:08 PM
  Read Replies (1) of 224741
 
Obama's teenage mentor liked sex with kids
Thomas Lifson

Closer scrutiny of the important people (that is, the poeple Obama himself identified as important) in Barack Obama's life is proving to yield what can only be called a "ick factor." Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Tony Rezko and Frank Marshall Davis head the list.

Frank Marshall Davis, the mentor described as "Frank" in Barack Obama's first autobiography, Dreams from my Father. Davis was not only a communist (a member of the actual Communist Party), but actually wrote about enjoying sex with teenagers, in a book authored pseudonymously. The Autonomist cites the evidence:

The Telegraph UK is reporting that Davis, a close friend of Obama's mother and his maternal grandfather, published an autobiographical, pornographic book, "Sex Rebel:Black," under the pseudonym "Bob Greene."

Marshall admitted to having written the book, which he said describes factual sexual encounters that he and his wife had with minors and other couples. "I could not then truthfully deny that this book, which came out in 1968 as a Greenleaf Classic, was mine," said Davis. The Telegraph states that, "In the introduction to Sex Rebel, Davis explains that although he has "changed names and identities...all incidents I have described have been taken from actual experiences."

Marshall's book describes, in lurid detail, his sexual encounters, including multiple group encounters with his wife and a 13 year old girl: "I'm not one to go in for Lolitas. Usually I'd rather not bed a babe under 20. But there are exceptions. I didn't want to disappoint the trusting child. At her still-impressionistic age, a rejection might be traumatic, could even cripple her sexually for life."

Davis described how the encounters with the child, who he called "Anne," would materialize: "Anne came up many times the next several weeks, her aunt thinking she was in good hands. Actually she was. She obtained a course in practical sex from experienced and considerate practitioners rather than from ignorant insensitive neophytes....I think we did her a favour, although the pleasure was mutual."

Today, the brilliant cartoonist Chris Muir takes up the theme.

Posted at 11:15 AM | Email | Permalink

Comments
"She's only thirteen / You know what I mean..."

Yep. You should be in jail!

Posted by: newton | August 24, 2008 11:32 AM

New York Times, September 11, 2001:
"He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen's sexual experimentation as they tried to 'smash monogamy.' The Weathermen were 'an army of lovers,' he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend."

Source: New York Times, September 11, 2001: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
query.nytimes.com

Read more: freerepublic.com

Posted by: Andy B | August 24, 2008 12:26 PM

This was 1968; that sort of thing was pretty much universal among counterculture believers of all kinds. There were laws, of course, but they were disregarded and ignored right, left and centre, like those against drugs or abortion, and people were invited not to feel guilty. In fact, what strikes me about this passage is how the man more or less has to talk himself into something that he does not even especially want - at least if, as he says, he is not drawn to women below 20. It is as though he is talking himself into doing a political duty. And in effect, if you remember how large numbers of people spoke and acted in those bewildered years, that is pretty much what happened. Someone ought to write a history of the propapaganda for sex from 1966 to 1974; you would not believe what you read. As a matter of fact, the violent reaction against paedophiles which seems so natural to us now began as a ground-level movement among parents in about 1971-72, in reaction exactly against this sort of trash. But until widespread disgust silenced them, underage sex was being pushed as hard and as shamelessly as homosexual, multi-partner and sadomasochistic sex are today.

Posted by: Fabio P.Barbieri | August 24, 2008 12:54 PM

Good night nurse, it just keeps getting worse.

From the Telegraph: "Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's half-sister, told the Associated Press recently that her grandfather had seen Mr Davis was "a point of connection, a bridge if you will, to the larger African-American experience for my brother". One shudders to think what else the relationship could have been a bridge to. Thankfully, Mr. Davis doesn't seem to have been interested in pubescent boys. Stanley Dunham and Davis apparently were great pals. How much did Grandpa Dunham know of the couple's proclivities when he handed over his grandson for mentoring?

There must be passages in "Dreams" that speak glowingly of Davis. Another opposition ad that practically writes itself.

Posted by: Kyda Sylvester | August 24, 2008 01:05 PM

Stuff like this is the smoking gun from the 60's free-love hippy movement. Free-love and open marriage goes back to decadent Euro-trash late 19th century socialists (usually the bored degenerate spoiled spawn of wealthy upper crust elites...like Lenin and Bill Ayres.) Their snarky symbolic response to uptight Victorian prudery and it's capitalist prosperity was drunken opiated bi-sexual orgies with no age restrictions at dad's country villa. Some weird hybrid of Oedipal payback and resentful juvenile hate transferrence. An insidious evil...proven by high level KGB defectors from behind the Iron Curtain and our moles in the Kremlin to be cultivated in our vulnerable society by their generous financing of CPUSA campus SDS Marxists to dissolve our cherished Christian bonds of virtue. Our strongest cultural sinew. Their battleground is cultural. Academic. Play the repressed Freudian lust card. Sexually corrupt the children first...it's their most vulnerable flank. 'I hate my parents...doesn't everybody? My Poli-Sci professor treats me like a serious adult. He's sooo cool!'
Why does the ACLU defend NAMBLA so vehemently? Why do judges schooled in 'Restorative Justice Theory' (offenders are mentally ill and must be treated compassionately and theraputically as patients...not stigmatized as criminals) reprieve brutal sadistic child rapists with little or no sentence? Who's in the hot tub with you...your honor? Herr Professor? Shall we book a child molester cruise to free open liberated progressive Thailand? (Such things are on the Net ya know.)
It all meshes nicely with Bill Ayre's and his 'Social Justice' curriculum...another form of kiddie abuse...to foster the contrived phony rage of class struggle identity politics. They are obediently following the warped marching orders of Karl Marx's 'Scientific Socialism' to subvert the mush brains of our children first...by any means necessary...all else will follow.
BHO is a clean well spoken articulate Black Panther in an elegantly draped custom Italian suit. The classic Maoist poison tipped needle in a cuddly ball of cotton. Don't buy his vague pseudo-intellectual gobble-de-gook for a second! Gee! I can't wait for their long promised multi-cultural no class...uh...class free...Utopia...can you?

Posted by: Ranger Joe | August 24, 2008 01:08 PM

I had a feeling about there being something like this, based on various things which did not add up to any sort of strong evidence. Well, score one for my intuition, which isn't always on or near target.

Posted by: ForNow | August 24, 2008 01:11 PM

I'm at a loss for words... I feel like I'm in some kind of bizzaro world watching an entire half of my own country being swept up in delusions... How in the hell did Obama - a man surrounded by truly dangerous communist radicals and depraved humans rife with perversity, hedonism, greed, racism, hate, militantism, and many other themes I haven't even touched on, get this close to the White House (and come to be revered by the Democrats who are supposedly for "FREEDOM")?

Do the young people who are the "useful idiots" of the left (to use Lenin's term) really think we are all making this stuff up? Do they even have a clue who these people are that they are wanting to entrust our country to? And, if so, do they really agree with the direction these people want to take the US in - DOWN into communism (because there is no socialism in our world, really)? Or, is the media really that much involved in perpetuating the delusions?

There is so much to analyze and figure out if we are to turn things around - because even if Obama is defeated it's not like the Dems are going anywhere. There can be no question now that those in power within the DNC and their most well-known elected officials, are clearly outright communists and radicals. Their support for the Neo-Soviet Union, and against the interests of the United States regarding the military, and foreign relations, war, etc... should make it even more obvious, really.

At least, it appears that Obama's star is getting a bit dinged and tarnished lately... I pray to God that Obama keeps spiraling downward, and the obstacles he has laid in his past (like his choice of "friends") continue to block his path. I also pray that there are enough people here in America that actually still understand Capitalism, Freedom, the Constitution, etc... that will not allow our country to succumb to the communist threat from the inside. I truly fear for our country if Obama would win, and his circle of friends were among the "inner circle" in our US Executive Branch - truly frightening indeed.

Thank you for bringing another "friend" of Obama's into clearer focus.

Posted by: LibertyRocks | August 24, 2008 05:25 PM

Wasn't Obama's mother named "Anne"...?

Posted by: Neocon Don | August 24, 2008 06:19 PM

Corruption is the name of the game. Corrupt the youth in all manner and forms, turn them against their moral upbringing and their parents, indoctrinate them into Marxism, fill their head with gobbledygook and viola, you end up with a candidate like Obama!!

Literally, God HELP us!!!

Posted by: Oakley | August 24, 2008 09:37 PM

Hillary.......the door cracks open a little bit more...

but, ahhh forget that, we are talking bout' dem'crats here......Bill Clinton & Monica, barney frank, Hillary and Reno or was it V.Foster.....

Posted by: sbark | August 24, 2008 11:00 PM

Leftism is the political manifestation of sexual perversion.

Think of all the children that these reprobates have corrupted. If they do not repent, well, I will not want to be anywhere near them on the day of judgment. Read Matt. 18:6 and Luke 17:2 to find out what the L-rd thinks of those who corrupt children.

Posted by: Mary Jo Hastings | August 24, 2008 11:14 PM

Wasn't the beat poet, Alan Ginsberg, one of the guys (or the guy) who started NAMBLA? He was probably a communist as well...is anybody aware of a connection with Ginsberg and Frank M. Davis? or Ginsberg and Bill Ayres? Ginsberg and the Weathermen? or... Davis, Ayres, the Weathermen and Boulder, Colorado? Ginsberg is a hero to many here...(also Home to Ward Churchill and many, many other "progressives)

Posted by: David | August 24, 2008 11:34 PM

Probably must readers / contributors to this site feel that group sex is terribly wicked, not least because it might well upset some important and wrathful Sky Fairy or other, but group sex was going on long ago, goes on right now and will be going on long after we're all dead of old age.

Concerning the corruption of youth: some - not all - thirteen-year-old girls are highly sexual beings and one can readily imagine a situation in which "Anne", a bold and cheery Pippa Longstocking, fearlessly took the lead and ended up in a jolly threesome. So? Is that REALLY so bad? The version of events so far suggest that "Anne" returned repeatedly for more of the same. Chris Muir the cartoonist calls this "child rape"; he must live in a mountain cave isolated from the world.

Where is "Anne" now? She must be in her fifties or even her sixties. Is she a Bible-thumping born-again Evangelical, a Moonie or simply a woman who has very agreeable memories of sensual caresses and delights long ago?

Posted by: Bill Corr | August 24, 2008 11:52 PM

americanthinker.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext