SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : 4:20 Rebellion .. it's about time

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Gersh Avery8/26/2008 7:25:03 AM
   of 237
 
Federal court, on 8/20, ruled that the DEA can no longer conduct anti marijuana efforts in CA. That they can not work to undermine a state law. Understand this: The court ruled that the DEA violates the US constitution when they do this in ANY state. The reason they can't enforce ANY marijuana laws is that they (the DEA) are unable to determine what is medical usage and what isn't. This was the DEA statement to the federal court.

-------------
“Much as the federal government may prefer that California keep medical marijuana illegal, it cannot force the state to do so.” –Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski

newsroom-l.net
------------------

On 8/25 CA AG Jerry Brown issued an order telling police in CA they can not enforce fed laws against medical marijuana within CA.

americansforsafeaccess.org

The federal government has been forced, in federal court, to recognize a states power to determine what is "accepted use."

That makes the placement of marijuana in schedule 1 of federal controlled substance act invalid since 1996.

Which means that there has been no lawful placement for marijuana within the federal CSA at all! Not since 1996.

Most states CSA's automatically reflect the schedules of the federal CSA. Which means that all marijuana convictions in the US since 1996 are invalid.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext