OK, I really am trying here! I went to the Issues page, where they are trying hard to fill in her views and positions, but it's slim pickins right now, and some of the things I am reading cause me even more concern. In addition to her totally oil and gas concentrated goals, I came across these statements:
Education:
Committed to providing strong education, including morals.. (Jan 2008)
(Stay OUT of my child's morals. I take care of those, thank you.)
Foreign policy: Ohmygosh:
Armed forces, including my son, give us security and freedom. (Jan 2008) Visits Kuwait; encourages Alaska big game hunting to troops . (Sep 2007) (maybe this means like- top Al Queda leaders?) Promote from within, in Alaska's National Guard. (Nov 2006)
Environment:
Sue US government to stop listing polar bear as endangered. (Aug 2008) (because it messes up the plans to drill?) We must encourage timber, mining, drilling, & fishing. (Jan 2008) Provide stability in regulations for developers. (Jan 2007) Convince the rest of the nation to open ANWR. (Jan 2007)
(Now there's a global plan)
There are the expected ones- anti gay marriage, anti abortion for almost all circumstances, for the death penalty
What they are going to do is "create" her. She will be forcefed views that she hasn't really evolved on her own, and she will be managed carefully. It could work, I suppose. |