The argument was always ideological, and that they would surround themselves with good people.
While Reagan and Bush both had great "people", they both had excellent experience to begin with.
There is no indication that Obama has "great people" -- other than the likes of William Ayres, Rev. Wright, Khalidi, and other hateful racists and terrorists -- to advise him.
Actually you take away the left/right ideological differences and Reagan and Obama are similar candidates, running similar campaigns.
Ha. You are FREAKING NUTS. Reagan was experience, Obama isn't. Reagan had the most focused presidency, perhaps, in history, with its target being ending the Cold War and nuclear proliferation, as well as improving the economy through tax cuts (all of which he accomplished). Obama has no focus as all and in fact, is the broadest in history, with "change" being the only real component, without so much as specifying WHAT he wants to change us to.
That would make such a stupid statement totally explains your ignorance. You have no concept of history, whatsoever. |
