SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 485.49+1.8%Nov 26 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: vinod Khurana who wrote (3530)10/20/1997 4:07:00 PM
From: vinod Khurana   of 74651
 
I showed a copy of the "final judgement" to my legal council (a close friend for over 20 years) and here is what he has to say about todays events:

"Microsoft Corp. has clearly violated the terms of the contract as set fouth by the United States government and the corporation. It should not be surprising to you or myself that Microsoft through its monopolistic actions has tried every which way it can to dominate the browser market and at the expense of Netscape Inc. It does not take a rocket scientist to understand why Microsoft gave away its IE browser
free of charge with its Windows 95 operating system. With Windows 95 O/S installed in over 85% of the desktop workstations around the world and with very little to no competition, Microsoft did not need to give away IE explorer free of charge...unless their intent was only one...to drive Netscape out of business. Microsoft knowingly violated the terms of the contract. The federal court in the United States will side with the Department of Justice. Microsoft will HAVE to pay the $1 million fine for every day it violated the contract."

That was a quote from my legal council upon comment on todays action by the DOJ. I concur with his statement.

V.K
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext