Donner Minerals (DML.V) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: VAUGHN who wrote (370)	10/20/1997 7:13:00 PM
From: Feline	of 11676

Given the "massive" nature of the mineralization and the limited history of the area , they probably wouldn't routinely assay for Pt or Pd on the first pass. They would only be looking for the levels of Ni and Cu as fast as possible. The Ag, Au, Pt and Pd levels in the DFR ore are uniformly low unlike most of the ores in Sudbury. Co assays from DRZ appear to be in about the same ratio as the Ni/Co ratio at DFR. So it looks like they were expecting a mineralogy similar to DFR type ores. It would be a good idea to assay for all precious metals but it is not that important right now as the gross value of this zone is off the scale. They are focused on the right elements at this time.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next