SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Spansion Inc.
CY 23.820.0%Apr 16 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bobs10 who wrote (4154)9/23/2008 3:01:19 PM
From: Joe NYC   of 4590
 
bobs,

In the pictures I've seen of SP1, JV3 abuts SP1. I'm not sure whether upgrading JV3 would be a preferred method, to add capacity, or not.

JV3 is 200mm, and is less advanced than Fab 25. The progression of migration is:
JV1/JV2 -> JV3 -> Fab25 -> SP1.

upgrading JV3 (short of mothballing a lot of equipment only gets to to where Fab25 already is.

From what I recall, SP1 has number of potential stages (3?) with 2000 wafer increments. So that's a plenty of capacity. And if even that is not enough, Spansion breaks the wall into JV3 and adds there.

If it was the other way around, and JV3 was more advanced than Fab 25, closing or selling Fab 25 would have been a non-brainer. But the problem is that Fab 25 is really still the bread and butter of Spansion, where most production takes place, so the options are not clear.

If Spansion got enough money for Fab25 to build another increment of SP1, that may be the way to go, but I don't think Spansion is anywhere near ready with customer migration to 65nm for SP1 to take over. Maybe in a year or two.

Joe
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext