Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (269997)	9/24/2008 4:51:32 PM
From: Archie Meeties	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 793851

Sounds like you're of the opinion that $150 million in funding of clean coal technologies will not yield any useful advances. You're entitled to that opinion. Here is the current state of the art in developing coal sequestration, very interesting stuff. netl.doe.gov arch.rivm.nl note figure 3 Seems to me that if CONSOL energy is looking into this, it's probably not out of the realm of economic feasibility. At the very least, it's worth further research. Advancing clean coal technologies in USA is an example of innovative and wise energy policy. Policy that, in fact, was begun in the Clinton administration and continued under GWB. If this makes Obama "evil", then sign me up!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next