Micron Only Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum

MU 435.79

+0.1%

Jan 29 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DavidG who wrote (22520)	10/21/1997 5:49:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) of 53903

>>he is willing to keep an open mind on all fundamental and technical news that comes across this thread as most others here.<< dg, you are incorrigable. we bears post details. we post dram pricing and our source. we say kippy's "demand" is full of sh*t and it turns out he is. we say tk is a nonsensical tout - and it turns out he is. we say people are nuts for buying mu over $50 and they are. we say they were nuts for buying over $40 and that jury is still out - but waaaaaaaaaaaaay in my favor. i'm also saying they were nuts to pay over $30. when we hit the teens then i'll declare victory on that, too. we analyze and predict mu's eps number. we go out on a limb and make an estimate. we are ballpark. the bulls were so far askew you guys aren't even woryth honorable mention. we've pegged this dawg to a t. you, on the otherhand, speak in vague generalites. you slime. you make nonsense inferences. >>As usual you are quoting someone elses postings, or misquoting mine....<< gee, is that the pot calling the kettle black. you mean you don't like that sort of thing ;-) >>If you think you can influence the market the next morning you are just making another mistake.<< another wild inference from you. >>But I have to admit trey's nonsense and especially yours is getting to point of being absurd.<< what nonsense from trey? you mean the nonsense of him having a ling position up into the $40s? on that we can agree ;-) other than that, i'd appreciate details of where trey hads been materially wrong. IF you have any and that just wasn't empty rhetoric. >>If you read one of my previous post you would have find out when MU broke 36 I stopped at 35 5/8<< i read that post. wasn't mu at $34 when you posted it ;-)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next