Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (422167)	10/3/2008 5:56:08 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) of 1575616

1. He was wrong to suggest the FF didn't define a legislative role for the VP. It's right there, spelled out in Article I. 2. He was also wrong to state that the "executive branch" is defined in Article I. (It's defined in Article II.) 3. He was wrong when he stated the constitution says the VP's job is to advise the president. It doesn't say anything of the kind. "Several framers ultimately refused to sign the Constitution, in part because they viewed the vice president's legislative role as a violation of the separation of powers doctrine." "During the twentieth century, the role of the vice president has evolved into more of an executive branch position. Now, the vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president's administration and presides over the Senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed. Yet, even though the nature of the job has changed, it is still greatly affected by the personality and skills of the individual incumbent." senate.gov As for mixing up Article I with Article II, Palin wouldn't even know what an article is. My God you need to be critiquing your VP candidate, not mine.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next