The New (Profitable) Ramtron Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The New (Profitable) Ramtron

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jimtracker1 who wrote (420)	10/3/2008 7:00:13 PM
From: makeuwonder	Read Replies (1) of 647

Jim and all I wish RMTR would go up. A watched pot never boils If I'm correct RMTR should have a naked short unreported number of shares. What bothers me is I wonder if some of the older management wasn't partially involved with this. Does this make sense? This is what keeps popping in my head. So we have shares that have never been purchased. It was most likely done through a fund that held tons of shares. Could the fund sell their real shares and then purchase them back now buying real shares. They would I presume have "SOME REAL SHARES LEFT IN THE FUND". So they sell their real shares. Then buy them back. They could force the prices down buying as they sell. This would scare people who have lost their patience or set stop/losses for awhile. In their fund they are reporting selling these shares. So the fund would take a loss this month. Buying back at least the number of real shares they hold in their fund. Then when they slowly paddle their way through that process they purchase real shares. Churning them around. Back there and from here on that's the part I'm not sure how it would work out. Could they wash these shares up like this? I'm probably not explaining it right. The claim is almost every stock in the market held at least some portion of FTD shares. I can't see why this information shouldn't be public and how by disclosing their positions they like give away the ingredients to Coke or something. I don't see it that way. Shorts are supposed to disclose their position. Don't see see that number posted about ever 15 to 30 days? How can that be a secret? This bill I hear is full of pork. I want to read it. I am going to try to check it out. It's out there. Why do we have to barter for a vote in the Congress/Senate? Why is it they put this weird stuff in like wooden arrows for children's toys? Where does this stuff come in? Why? It's like a bribe isn't it? I've read they aren't going to make the hedge funds disclose their naked short position. Well not as of yet. They say maybe they will do it in 45 days. This should give them a chance to do some changes. Like maybe buy the shares they say they have? Wish RMTR would come out with something noble towards the shareholders. It would be a nice gesture on their part to give up something and do something this direction. It would give the company a feeling of common sense. Integrity. They would hopefully get a nice news release over their generosity. Free advertising. They are so close or bust that's how I feel. I always considered money spent on stocks or gambling of any kind gone money. It was expected to never come back. If it does great if not, oh well!! I wouldn't have spent it had I needed it to pay the bills. We all need to spend some time reading the bill then talk it over. We need to start paying attention and expressing our thoughts together and then start letting those who don't think we are listening a message. Like our "Great-Great-Great Grandparents did. My last 2 started getting lax and let it get started. I feel like it started growing about the 40's. One wink and nod let to another and 40 to 50 years later you have ballooned out accidently so big the show became obvious. It's starting ruining the best Country in the world. JMO... Any thoughts on the bill I could fight about with you? It's good to have differences. JMO, Kim

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next