SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold & Gold Stock Analysis
GLD 399.29+0.9%Dec 17 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TheBusDriver who wrote (15431)10/7/2008 2:07:03 PM
From: Nevada9999  Read Replies (1) of 29622
 
Two facts (I think):

1. Increasing lease rates must mean increasing amounts of gold are being borrowed. I don't think there is any reason to borrow gold other than to (forward) sell it.

2. Gold lease rate spikes in 1999 and 2001 coincide exactly with the double bottoms in the gold price.

Interpretation:

I don't know who could be selling large amounts of gold forward other than producers. In 1999 and 2001 it was Barrick, Placer Dome and every producer in Australia and South Africa (except Goldfields). I guess the producers are beginning to panic again and hedge. If history rhymes, this is short term negative and longer term positive for gold. It is positive for gold producers that aren't hedging and negative for those that are. If mine supply is being sold forward even while it is already declining and projected to decline faster, central banks or any entity concerned about a rising gold price should be very afraid.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext