SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Datek Brokerage $9.95 a trade

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jack Zahran who wrote (5515)10/21/1997 12:21:00 PM
From: Andrew White  Read Replies (1) of 16892
 
<<<t is also clear Rodney that whenever a statement that is made on this thread
even appears to have a negative bent, you quickly try to change the subject
and start making personal attacks instead. The issues I am trying to get clear
on has to do with the true costs of trading with a discount broker. Peter and
Jon's comments have been very informative thus far with regard to these
issues. I still have other questions that I think other traders would also like to
know the answers to. These issues do not just apply to Datek, but that is the
brokerage I am familiar with. This also happens to be the thread where most
of these type discussions occur.>>

Jack, I can't wait to hear the decision on your abitration. If the decision is ruled in your favor, that should put Babcock in his place. But I'm sure he'll squeal his way out.

One thing I've noticed about Babcock--which is the exact same thing I notice of Datek--is that he NEVER takes responsibility. He ALWAYS has an excuse. It's amazing to me that he should think he's so perfect.

Reading through 5000+ messages, has anyone EVER seen one message by Babcock in which he apologizes? Any message in which he says he's mistaken or wrong? I've never seen any.

Amazing to be in the presence of perfection. NOT!

Andy
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext