COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF

COMS 0.00400

+185.7%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scrapps who wrote (7161)	10/21/1997 1:05:00 PM
From: drmorgan	Read Replies (2) of 22053

This suggests that improving bandwidth to the home via cable-TV or satellite modems may not give users much of an improvement over 56 kbps modems until Internet throughput is improved. The article point out so many variables like where you can have a factor. When I run two ISND b-channels the comparison to analog is something else. All sites come in much faster, of course I'm excluding a site with a serious server problem. As far as downloading files go the difference is amazing. Glenn uses a cable modem and his experience completely contradicts this statement. The backbone is under constant evolution. I don't know, I guess it must come down to where you live. If ISDN was not substantilly faster than analog I would have dumped it long ago. Derek

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next