THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 680.73

-0.2%

Dec 15 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: pompsander who wrote (23664)	10/10/2008 4:36:00 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (2) of 25737

What you are proposing is some kind of background test that would "disqualify" persons....right? What? Wrong... if I asked 1000 people, you would be the only one who does not understand the question... I'll see if I can present it differently... If you applied for the lowest level job at the Secret Service, you would have to undergo a very strict background check, and if you told the investigators that certain segments of your past is off limits, that you do not want them to investigate those periods in your life, this would likely disqualify you because it would appear you have something undesirable to hide... are you still with me? You don't find it odd that the person applying for the HIGHEST position in the land can simply tell everyone that they cannot look at his school record or who his associates are? Anyone applying for even the most basic entry level position would disqualify himself if he ever said he didn't want his history to be examined... Did you get it all? Do you find it odd that obama can hide his history from review from those people who are considering him for the job? I think most people find it very odd... GZ

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next