SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (427029)10/16/2008 9:37:49 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1575892
 
Could they hit the US? Of course. Could they destroy the US?

No. Not even close.


Actually, pretty close. They had a couple hundred SLBMs with adequate range to wipe out every coastal city in the United States. Seattle, San Fran, LA, NYC, Houston, NOLA, Miami, Boston, all the way around.

In addition, the R7 had a 6,000 mile range, fully deployed. However, they had ALMOST ready for deployment (in '61) the SS7 with a range of 8,100 miles. Now, it is a fact that the USA had a larger stockpile of warheads at that time.

But the principal advantage of missiles in Cuba to USSR (and disadvantage to US) was that it reduced the advanced warning to nothing, leaving insufficient time for the US to get a MAD launch off the ground before missiles began hitting the southern USA.

Again, I cannot believe you are claiming that USSR didn't have a massive ability to strike the US with nuclear weapons without Cuba. Because they most certainly did, and it certainly could be a strike which utterly destroyed the United States.

MAD was stupid, in addition to being immoral. Cuba was not an essential element in MAD, obviously. If that's what you're claiming, you are pretty ignorant of some well-known facts.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext