SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (90286)10/16/2008 10:59:56 AM
From: thames_sider  Read Replies (1) of 541791
 
Crippling his business is making it harder for him to and his peers to support employees who can then pay him and his peers for goods and services.

I don't see how paying more taxes cripples his business or makes it harder for him to take on more employees.
Taxes on a business are paid out of profits, not turnover. Employee costs are earlier. If Joe really wants, he can take on enough employees and pay them enough that he doesn't pay any taxes at all (a rather odd stance for a businessman, since it implies no profits, but you never know).

The only taxes AFAIK that would work otherwise are payroll or employee-related taxes which I assume include healthcare. Certainly if these get too high businesses become very unwilling to take on new staff, France being a classic example in Europe: but Obama has already said in context that he plans not to increase these taxes so I don't see where the issue is?

Other than that, you're arguing about tax levels and where the tax burden ought to reside, which are charged value judgements... even I won't try too many answers on that just now.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext