SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (427156)10/16/2008 3:07:34 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 1571928
 
"Looking the other way (for fear of disenfranchising poor and minority voters) and denying the existing evidence of voter fraud under ACORN does not support the notion that you take voter fraud seriously."

Dance, spin, weave and bob.

Are there fraudulent voter registration forms?

Sure.

Are there fraudulent voter identifications issued?

Don't know. I haven't seen much in the way of evidence. I think that the DOJ has gotten about a dozen of so cases in the past few years.

Are there fraudulent votes cast with those voter IDs?

Well, of the DOJ cases, only a couple resorted in a vote. There is a much larger number of double voting by snow birds that was found by a single reporter. Photo IDs wouldn't stop these, nor would they have stopped the known DOJ cases.

So I fail to see how not taking a fairy tale seriously means I don't take voter fraud seriously.

Voter fraud should be taken seriously. Using voter fraud as an issue to suppress legitimate voters, though, is a type of voter fraud that is much more prevalent. Why is Republican voter fraud ok?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext