Chesapeake Gold (CKG.V) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Chesapeake Gold (CKG.V)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bat Man who wrote (2119)	10/17/2008 3:16:01 AM
From: TheBusDriver	Read Replies (1) of 7833

I liked what I read...it is in line with what I expected....potential for expanding looks promising but only one hole is not enough to get excited that way yet. We already knew the ore was "difficult". Disappointed that assay's are on average 15% lower but looks like CKG will be able to compensate for this....by expanding the resource and offsetting cost. I expected bio-whatsit...so the roasting was a surprise....but makes sense if sulfuric acid will lower the cash cost down to $150...plus co-generation and zinc credits all help the bottom line. The big question now will be recovery rate? Looks good to me, but I am a bozo. CC will have something to say I am sure. Probably everyone was emailing him last night anyway<g> oh, and they need to learn to spell "sulfuric"....but who am I to talk?<g> Wayne

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next