Big Dog's Boom Boom Room Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Webster Groves who wrote (112169)	10/18/2008 8:12:31 PM
From: Bearcatbob	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) of 206209

"An increased reliance on clean coal, which I personally favor, would do the same. Regardless of the choice, CO2 will be produced because it is dictated by the laws of combustion." Webster - the whole issue of clean coal is one of the great misleads of the campaign. Obama is for clean coal. That is his stated policy. What he does not say is what "clean coal" is in his mind. Here is the definition from his web site. Develop and Deploy Clean Coal Technology. Obama’s Department of Energy will enter into public private partnerships to develop five “first-of-a-kind” commercial scale coal-fired plants with clean carbon capture and sequestration technology. Please note that clean coal for Obama means CO2 capture and sequestration. In the Kentucky primary he said he supported Kentucky coal. Well - yes he is for it while he is completely against it. Why - because the technology does not exist. I will leave the readers to characterize this type of posturing. His positon on nuclear energy is similar.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next