SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: skinowski who wrote (9020)10/20/2008 1:52:06 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) of 41475
 
I've always preferred counts that considered everything from 1929-1942 to be three waves within the same bear. Corrections are rarely pretty events to count, either.

It will be interesting to see, in the fullness of time, how the 2000 top should be labeled. I suspect the REAL top was 2007, and depending upon how severe this bear is, the price low will come on the four-year-cycle lows due in either 2010, 2014, or 2018. I used to say 2014, but I'm starting to wonder if 2018 isn't a better target. Japan took thirteen years, assuming its low is in:



The 1929 bear really ran for thirteen years as well.

Ten years from now, with equities completely ignored for a decade, the boomer demographic wave having fully crashed against the economic and financial shoreline, prices bottom with a whimper and a glorious, new baby bull is born...

`BC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext