SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: HPilot who wrote (142748)10/23/2008 1:57:55 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
Look Hugh, 50 million first mortgages and 1.7 million defaults are govt figures as of about 2 weeks ago. Do you own research if you want. that article I posted was a little old but had the same basic numbers.

The point is a 2% mortgage default rate should never be enough to destroy a banking system. The issue is obviously leverage due to swaps. It isn't the bad debt thats the problem its the 50 trillion in SWAPS sold against that debt that can bring the house down. Thats why Paulson can't allow any more BKs, not that the debt is bad its the swaps.

So please quit arguing that giving loans to POOR PEOPLE is the issue here. With a 2% default rate, it can't be the issue. that is obvious to all.

But even beyond that, I will say the banks created toxic loans to give to said poor people which should not have been created. I am a landlord and I have people that have rented from me for years- these people would be fine risks with a fair loan package. But this type of person was not offered a fair loan, he was offered a scam toxic loan with a Libor adjust in the FINE PRINT. If I did that as a landlord I would create short term gains and long term problems for myself so I dont' do it. Banks should behave the same but did not.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext