SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: goldworldnet who wrote (276557)10/25/2008 4:02:31 AM
From: LindyBill6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 793843
 
I like very much how you phrased this. For me it reflects original Americanism and war with those who would prefer this country to be another Europe.

It's the reason the French Revolution failed and the American one succeeded. Our founders understood the fallacy of the "strong man," and built in checks and balances. The French were all "kill the King" and ended up with another one.

The French never understood our revolution because they were not readers of Locke. They welcomed the man who integrated the basic ideas, Thomas Paine, then jailed him when he protested their reign of terror.

Thomas Sowell does an excellent job of describing this in his book, A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles

amazon.com

I consider Sowell our best living Philosopher.

It is ironic that in the same year, 1776, that Tom Paine wrote "Common Sense" and integrated Individualism and the Enlightenment for America, Kant wrote Critique of Pure Reason, which Hegel and Marx used as their basis for the destruction of those two concepts.

Ayn Rand put it: "Plato, Hegel and Kant. Three destroyers of the modern world."

I add in Marx and Rousseau to that miserable group.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext