THE WHITE HOUSE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE

SPY 684.45

+0.1%

Dec 4 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill who wrote (24642)	10/27/2008 6:19:13 PM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (3) of 25737

This is not my usual area of practice, as JL has also admitted too, but in order to discourage frivilous appeals in many civil appeal cases the party appealing must post a bond to protect the other side (which already won) from incurring endless expense and time costs on a frivilous matter. so, to appeal be sure you got a really good case! Now to your exact point, I'm not sure. This was not a judgement on the merits, but on a standing question...so I am going to tuck my tail between my legs and admit I am not sure if a bond would be required here.... Hopefully a "real lawyer" can help us out. <g>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next