>>> Your assumptions about other people's ignorance is often unwarranted.
It isn't an assumption. It is my determination based on your post.
>>> "Joe" has mis-stated almost every aspect of his situation. Why should I take this particular detail at face value?
To my knowledge he has not mis-stated any material fact.
More importantly, even if the entire question had been posed as a hypothetical, he still FORCED Obama to answer a question which not one member of the liberal media had managed to get out of him, i.e., that he is wants to redistribute the wealth of the nation.
Now, today, we find out there is even more history here -- history that most assuredly would never have come to light without Joe's insightful question.
The liberal media has failed miserably in its job this year. Joe helped pick up the slack left behind by NYT, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, WAPO, LAT, and many others. For that, we owe him a debt of gratitude.
Only because of Joe can we say, "CJ, you were forewarned. He's a freaking socialist. Or worse." |
