Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: thames_sider who wrote (67905)	10/29/2008 1:47:04 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) of 90947

The Obama website should not be regarded as trustworthy. Of the other two, snopes is the most trustworthy but even it can be fooled and doesn't consider many things. For example, Snopes doesn't address the question, was Obama a member of the New Party. He was. And the New Party was started by and promoted by the Democratic Socialists of America. I posted something from the DSA's own archives which listed him as one of their candidates. I submit: - the Democratic Socialists of America is/was clearly a socialist party - the DSA in its own newsletter openly promoted the New Party and wrote of Obama as one of their successful candidates. Thats seems like pretty clear evidence and it doesn't depend on any conjecture or any RW bloggers. Its straight from the horses mouth.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next