SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (144402)10/31/2008 12:37:18 PM
From: tonto  Read Replies (1) of 173976
 
LOLOL!

Funniest post of the day. (I know it was by accident) THANKS!

Here is the CORRECT argument.

Case 1: parent and 5 year old child.
case 2: parent and 3 mos old fetus.

Case 1- child needs bone marrow transplant from parent to survive. Parent refuses (dead beat dad or whatever). Child dies. What do we do to parent? Answer NOTHING.

Case 2- parent and 3 mos old fetus. Fetus needs parent to survive. parent refuses and has an abortion.

How is case 2 different than case 1? It ISN'T at least in a legal setting and that is why most abortion cases focus on outlying procedures and parental consent. This basic issue of human rights and violating one persons rights for another is clear in our society. We do not violate one persons rights in favor of another. Abortion will always be legal unless one particular state decides to enact stricter rules and all the people support it so it never gets brought to the higher courts.

End of discussion
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext