Jules, re: DOJ v. Microsoft
Just my opinion, if the DOJ is successful in limiting Microsoft's inclusion of additional functions in it's operating systems, it will limit the execution of their core business plan going forward. The implications go beyond browsers, they extend to all additions to the future OS upgrades that would make them a compelling purchase for business/home users. The OS would then become what it originally was, a shell that allows other software to perform, rather than an application on it's own merits. Microsoft would have to compete with their R&D and execution in each application. A good example is voice recognition, if included in Win98 or later upgrade, it would become the standard. If not allowed, the market would be open to competition amoung the many companies that have focused on the technology. Internet phone, video confrencing are other examples where Microsoft could lose it's power to select the standard, and to sell the products disguised as an upgrade of their OS.
It's early in the legal process, Microsoft may win or a settlement that is beneficial to Microsoft might be reached. I think there is significant risk to Microsoft's money machine if things go against them.
Opposing views encouraged, I could be convinced to change my opinion.
John
|
