SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 401.14+1.9%Feb 6 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Charles Tutt who wrote (3723)10/22/1997 3:57:00 PM
From: Jon Stept  Read Replies (4) of 74651
 
IMHO, this DOJ evidence is weak....

The onus is on the DOJ to prove that Microsoft witheld "their" (the Microsoft definition) conception of Windows 95 from manufacturers for anti-competitive reasons. The Compaq testimony only shows that MIcrosoft would not allow Compaq to sell an OS that looked like Windows 95, but was not by MIcrosoft definition. It was Compaq's definition of Windows 95, not Microsoft's, that Compaq wanted to sell.

(Windows 95 - IE) does not equal Windows 95. And they did not want Compaq to advertise and sell it as such. They probably (guessing) would have let them sell it with IE and Navigator, but not without IE. All Windows OS's have been sold with minimal set plus extras, but not miinus from minimal set.

They say they will show them as being seperate product's Seems like we are getting into a very grey area of semantics between product, component, etc. What if Microsoft had a "Product Development Team" for Defrag and Disk Compressor, let alone other OS compnoents that are native to their OS's, like their Disk Administrator or License Manager for NT Server? Does that mean that it was a seperate product.

I have held MIcrosoft for about 2 years and during the past 2 weeks I have considered selling my stock because I disdain anti-competitive companies. But it looks like time and time again, Microsoft is walking a fine line very gracefully.

Thanx,

Jon :)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext