Amati investors Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Amati investors

AMTX 1.525

-0.7%

11:02 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sticks who wrote (27698)	10/22/1997 7:15:00 PM
From: bill c.	Read Replies (3) of 31386

Sticks: "Westell contends that the Bell Canada RFP is a non-exclusive, non-commitment award, and therefore undoable". What? Westell lost the contract for Bell Canada.... period. Alcatel has the contract and Westell has an order for a few thousand modems. Alcatel indicates they won a contract, Westell thinks it's undoable. Fellows you lost the contract and I'm hoping this wasn't one of the BIG-3 contracts mentioned during the last conference call. Gary indicated that long-term multi-year contracts are being finalized, well if this is the case, Alcatel has the contract and Westell is now in denial mode. The word that really gets me is "UNDOABLE". If the contract with Alcatel is non-exclusive, why can't Alcatel sell some equipment and Westell sell some equipment. Why does the Alcatel contract have to be undone for Westell to be included? I don't understand the undoable wording... until later.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next