SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (117079)11/26/2008 10:10:31 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
Knighty, you get an A+ for research for finding that PDF.

i didn't so much mean to say that nobody said it was surplus, even official government agencies, rather, i meant to say there was, factually, no surplus. if i said nobody claimed it, i'm obviously wrong about that.

the debt rose in both 1998 and 2000 - and every other year clinton was in office.

09/30/2001 5,807,463,412,200.06
09/30/2000 5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999 5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998 5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 5,413,146,011,397.34

treasurydirect.gov
treasurydirect.gov

it seems that the clinton white house had problems defining multiple words during his administration. ;-)

somehow, i don't think you'd quite the government's inflation numbers as fact - b/c you don't believe them to be true even though they claim it.

he came close, but no cigar on a surplus.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext