Politics of Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Eric who wrote (3217)	11/30/2008 6:26:42 AM
From: Bearcatbob	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) of 86352

Eruc, Let's take this debate apart a bit. "I never once mentioned polar bears." No you did not - but you are using the same tactics of scare. "The pollution fallout on our coastline has been scientifically well documented. We know where it is coming from. " Of course it is. But you simply blamed it on coal. You did not even mention that the problem is how it used. This has nothing to do with science - it has everything to do with you not being factual in your posts. Why do you do that? Will your arguments not stand on their own? Why do you have to distort? I would really like an explanation of your motives. "I'm beginning to think you don't believe in science at all " LOL - I have an advanced degree in engineering. I know what can be done and what is not being done. I know from real life experience the terrible distortions caused by fear mongers like you. The question remains - what is your motive and to what means of distortion will you stoop to promote your agenda?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next