SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (168202)12/2/2008 11:43:03 AM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (2) of 306849
 
I don't know where you are coming up with this but the answer below for me is no. I am not one of the massively grandfathered tax people in this state. Virtually every neighbor I have pays half the taxes I do or less. One of my houses has a next door house that is vacant because the descendants of the original owners have so little carrying costs they don't even bother to rent it. I think the entire problem is the elderly in this state who have consistently voted for bene's for themselves at the expense of others.

Live2sail is joking when he says dump the elderly in CA but they are the problem.

my guess is you want others to pay more taxes while not doing so yourself. so, would you pay more taxes if CA's property tax law were changed to charge everyone the going rate on assessed values?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext