SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: combjelly who wrote (437880)12/3/2008 7:04:08 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 1574444
 
>> >So you don't know what a chain of custody is either.

I know what a chain of custody is as it pertains to legal evidence. I have no idea whether similar rules are applicable, or should be, for ballots.

But I know that when you allow ballots that show up late to be counted you open one more door to manipulation.

You just can't give Dems a chance at stealing an election or they'll do it every time.


If there is a chain of custody, then there is no reason they shouldn't be tallied.

Yeah, you say that but that's not my view. Establishing a "chain of custody" does little to insure that fraudulent behavior isn't undertaken. If, for example, the chain of custody involves several Democrats, there would be nothing whatsoever to keep them from colluding to steal an election. Democrats will do that; we learned that in 2000.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News