American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DuckTapeSunroof who wrote (30334)	12/12/2008 12:00:54 PM
From: Peter Dierks	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 71588

Buddy, by your logic, if you see a thing you want and someone offers you something similar but less desirable item you rejected the thing you thought you wanted when you rejected the lesser substitute. The Berg case was out there. (assume for a moment the worst case scenario that Obama is an illegal immigrant) The liberals may have rejected because a democrat President is more important than upholding the Constitution. And the constructionists may have rejected it to get to the Berg case. When a case is rejected and you don't know the reason nor do I, your suggesting that it must be for the reasons you wish for is reaching.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next