SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Spekulatius who wrote (33028)12/13/2008 3:24:47 PM
From: Paul Senior1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 78754
 
re ARW, AVT, electronics distributors

re: "I've been satisfied with results obtained from a formulaic approach applied to a package of these stocks."

I stand by my statement, but as I dig back further now, I'm not so sure I should be so satisfied. Good results for ARW/AVT--- now though I am recalling big losses with SEMI, plus the time value of money tied up in some of these other smaller distributors (even if $ amounts invested were small). Some were done in an ira, and I've got no records of transactions (as I do with tax records for non-ira stuff). Perhaps "selective memory" is really operating here, and I'm not doing so okay as I seem to believe with my formula.

For AVT: here's a Yahoo graph:

finance.yahoo.com

Here's your current comment: "Looking back at 2001/2002 it seems that ARW,AVT made losses due to the cost of rightsizing their business after the dotcom boom, not due to credit risk. I expect the same thing will happen in Y2009."

I suspect you could be correct, and if so, that the business and stock will improve by, or in, 2010. I am just playing what I hope to be is the cycle.

Fwiw, here's my post where I was buying AVT in Sept '02 based on my simple formula.

Message 17953242

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext