SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE WHITE HOUSE
SPY 670.92+0.1%Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: DuckTapeSunroof12/13/2008 4:53:24 PM
   of 25737
 
Sources say NATO eyeing Afghan route

Published: Dec. 13, 2008 at 1:05 PM
upi.com

KABUL, Afghanistan, Dec. 13 (UPI) -- NATO officials are planning a new supply route to Afghanistan through Russia and central Asia, avoiding dangerous territory in Pakistan, sources say.

NATO and Russian sources said recent attacks along the international military organization's supply route through Pakistan have prompted NATO to speed up creation of a safer railway route, The Times of London reported Saturday.

"It'll be weeks rather than months," an unidentified NATO official said of the route's construction. "Two months max."

The sources said the former Soviet central Asian states of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are in final negotiations with NATO officials regarding the new route.

News of the proposed NATO route to Afghanistan follows growing concern among NATO and U.S. officials regarding this year's Pakistan attacks.

"We're all increasingly concerned," Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chief of Staff, said Wednesday. "But in that concern, we've worked pretty hard to develop options."

The Times said, according to its sources, while NATO is eyeing a northern corridor route through Russian negotiations, the organization is also examining a supply route through the central Asian state of Turkmenistan.

© 2008 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext