SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (441439)12/19/2008 12:03:22 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1574184
 
So then, if the vast majority of the people in the military also don't want a black man to lead them or a woman, you think they have to respect their wishes?

Well, we've had black leadership before (Powell) and it wasn't a problem. So the point is moot.

But when military people don't have any respect for the leadership I do believe it is a problem, whether black, white, or whatever.

There is nothing new about this.

Consider the case of Gen. Horatio Gates in the Revolutionary War. He totally lost the respect of his soldiers and only Gates' underling, (Col) Benedict Arnold could get the soldiers to follow him. Because they respected Arnold, and not Gates (which we now know, of course, was misplaced respect, but at the time Benedict Arnold was a war hero).

So, it isn't so much about gay/straight, black/white, but it is a question of whether soldiers will respect a gay's leadership authority. Maybe they will; 16 years ago they wouldn't have, we know that.

Given the experience Clinton had early on, it would be pretty foolish for Obama to make a similar mistake. I don't think he will.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext