SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Environmentalist Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: neolib who wrote (23488)12/21/2008 11:30:14 PM
From: Maurice Winn2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) of 36917
 
Neo, their theory was obviously silly as a casual inspection of the history shows. It looks as though your theorists were refugees from Technical Analysis in the stock market, perhaps using head and shoulders stochastic blah blah blah...

They presumably had lots of expensive numbers and equations written down on their "paper". But it was obviously bunkum. Perhaps they are also people who are on the take from the Global Warming tsunami of loot for "research" which shows Global Warming is terrible and we should all give them more money to do further research and stop the world.

It's amusing that Exxon is meant to be funding the swarms of people who say Global Warming due to anthropogenic CO2 isn't happening [though I doubt almost anyone is receiving cash and I certainly am not], but the obvious fact that the Doomsterists are on the take from taxpayer loot is ignored. If you want bias, I recommend looking at the Greenhouse Effect doomsters.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext