>Joe said: "EQ is the one who needs to apologise. Honey DID NOT ask Dave to delete his post."
>>Joe,
>>What you said is true, but it's not likely to happen. It takes a modicum of character to admit when you are wrong and to apologize for it.
_________________________________________
Speaking of modicum of character, I wonder when CENSORbees pal (as she put it) who allegedly reported my TOS COMPLIANT post to SI Dave will admit his dastardly deed.
Thats not likely to happen either, because if CENSORbee has any pals, none of them are guilty. If an alleged pal does come foreword and admits it, then it is a false admission made under duress.
This whole sordid affair brings up two points:
1) It is shameful, despicable and very, very WRONG to report a TOS compliant post just because you happen to not like (i.e. HATE) someone.
2) It is shameful, despicable and very, very WRONG to lack a modicum of character to not ADMIT (and in fact deny) reporting a TOS compliant post just to get revenge on someone you happen to not like (i.e. HATE.)
Now, I wonder who I can complain to about the THOUSANDS of hateful messages that CENSORbee and pig post about me on the googlewhatever board. They accuse me of being a schizo, a stalker, a druggie, and worse. Would the owner or manager of that board hear me out and take remedial action? LOL! Good luck on that!
Cheerio!
Elan |
