Again, shorts, I guess there is a language issue here.
I'm not sure what this means, "every time you say I didn't give a 'substantiate' [sic] evidence the stock is a Scam."
I'm just guessing now, but I think you are saying that even though your posts were not substantive, the stock turned out to be a scam, and somehow you are taking credit for that.
You finish off by saying you were right and I was somehow wrong. Again, you haven't provided a specific post where I said you were wrong, let alone, even one iota of evidence that I brutally attacked you.
Yes, I "brutally attack" posts that are non-substantive, but typically, that is to get substantive information. I learn much from negative posters and often make decisions on that basis.
If a substantive post convinces me to sell, I do. I think I did that with your JPHC. If a negative post is moronic or vacuous, is there anything wrong with pointing that out? I've often posted that I just ignore the ridiculous one-line positive posts, but I do pay attention to negative posts, primarily to make sure that I haven't missed anything.
So, as to who was right and who was wrong, I don't see a specific post to discuss. Unlike you, I am not claiming to be right all the time.
I'll leave that to you, Mr. Infallible.
:-) |
