SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 236.73-6.1%Jan 30 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tecate78732 who wrote (257610)12/27/2008 6:10:27 PM
From: mas_Read Replies (1) of 275872
 
My point is that Intel never had a plan to leave x86. They were hiring teams for x86 in 2001 timeframe.

Yes they did but that was in 1994 at the beginning

pcreview.co.uk

Intel spokesman Howard High said the intent of the technology agreement is to have a single architecture that will replace all others from either company.

Once they realised what a train wreck Merced/Itanium 1 was going to be by 1996-7 both x86 and PA-Risc suddenly got reprieves and fresh roadmaps. When AMD defined x86-64 Prescott was designed to include the original version of it in it but was only turned on when Opteron was a success as a 64-bit server chip.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext