SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (25260)10/23/1997 2:09:00 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (1) of 1575181
 
John,

Re: "If your voltage equation is true, AMD's processors
should be running x% slower than Intels (desktop or notebook), where "x" is the
percentage by which operating voltage is higher."

Yes, this is partially correct ... BTW, this has been demonstrated
in the .35um generation.

300mhz(2.5V) = 233mhz(3.2V)

For mobile CPU's, the above only holds comparing CPU's at the same power.

I'm willing to see if this holds true for the .25um generation as well.
Also, we haven't even talked about the "power" issues associated with
higher supply voltages. I think you should ask AMD why they
are not optimizing their .25um process for a lower voltage !! Let me
know what you hear back.

Make It So,
Yousef
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News