SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : American International Petroleum Corp

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Terry W Weaver who wrote (3952)10/23/1997 3:04:00 PM
From: taxikid  Read Replies (1) of 11888
 
man you better re-think that post terry-
here is the deal-
a market maker {MM} [nazdaq]-
is supposed to
1]attempt to fill/execute orders for their firms customers
2]trade for their "own" accounts
3]make a two sided market
4]make money
the MM has 4 primary ways to trade-
1]act[phone]trades
2]selectnet
3]instinet
4]soes
the market maker has to have inventory to "fill" the orders- and has to buy as well as sell-
so- as the stock falls- he loses money on current inventory and offsets this loss by either selling short-or hi volume on the "spread" in a crash scenario the market maker is more vulnerable than the average investor- who is he going to "sell" to?
especially when stocks fall rapidly like the 30 point dip in IBM in 1987-
so to assume that it is the MM- manipulating- that is just crazy and shows us your lack of knowledge about the market.
the manipulation is in the spread- i would believethat when this stock was 7 the overhead supply in the market makers inventory was sold off and the stock sold short-the market maker arbs his position by filling orders "short" and not needing an uptik- he takes the risk and there can make a ton of money- to offset other losses incurred- regards
taxi
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext